Call or Click: How a Multi-Site Veterinary Group Used Market Research and Strategy Advisory to Decide Whether to Build Its Own Telehealth Capability or Partner With a Platform
Executive Snapshot
Client
Situation/Challenge
Objective
Constancy Researchers Solution
Impact
Client Outcome
The Situation / Challenge
Veterinary telehealth occupies an interesting position in the broader wave of healthcare digitisation. The clinical use cases that generate the most genuine demand from pet owners are not the ones that feel most futuristic.
The client’s digital team had been tracking the telehealth platforms entering the veterinary market and believed that building the capability in-house, within the group’s existing client app, would produce better brand integration and client data continuity than relying on a third-party platform. The clinical director was less convinced that the investment was worth it.
Neither camp had done the work to understand what comparable veterinary groups had actually experienced when they built versus when they partnered, and the absence of that evidence meant the debate was running on professional conviction rather than comparable outcome data.
Key Challenges
- No independent market benchmarking of build-versus-partnership outcomes at comparable multi-site veterinary groups.
- A digital team build proposal that the clinical director considered timeline-optimistic without independent evidence to validate or challenge that concern.
- Two platform partnership offers evaluated without a structured comparison of their clinical workflow integration depth or white-label branding flexibility.
- No assessment of how the two models compared on client retention outcomes at comparable veterinary group scales.
- A clinical director and commercial director holding different views without external evidence to resolve the disagreement.
- Growing pet owner demand for remote triage and post-operative monitoring that the group was currently meeting through informal phone calls with no structured record or billing framework.
Veterinary telehealth that exists as informal phone calls is not telehealth. It is unpaid clinical time generating no record, no billing, and no data. Formalising it through the right model, one that integrates with clinical workflow and carries the practice brand, converts an existing cost into a structured service without requiring the group to build something it was not equipped to build well.
Constancy Researchers Solution
Constancy Researchers delivered market research benchmarking build-versus-partnership outcomes at comparable veterinary groups, then applied strategy advisory to identify which of the two platform offers better matched the client’s clinical workflow and branding requirements.
Veterinary Telehealth Market Report: Build vs Partnership Outcome Benchmarking
- Delivered a market research report benchmarking telehealth capability outcomes at multi-site veterinary groups in the UK and Ireland.
- Found that in-house builds at comparable groups had consistently taken longer and cost more than initial estimates.
Platform Partnership Assessment: Clinical Workflow Integration
- Evaluated both platform partnership offers on depth of integration with the clinical workflow systems the group’s practices used.
- Found that one platform offered direct integration with the practice management software the group already used.
White-Label Branding & Client Experience Assessment
- Assessed both platforms on their white-label branding flexibility.
- Found that the platform with stronger clinical integration also offered deeper white-label branding.
Client Demand & Use Case Prioritisation
- Analysed the group’s own phone triage and post-operative call records to quantify the volume and type of consultations that the telehealth service would formalise, and identified which practice locations were generating the highest informal triage call volumes.
- Found that post-operative monitoring check-ins and triage calls combined represented a high-volume.
Implementation Roadmap & Rollout Sequencing
- Recommended the white-label partnership with the clinically integrated platform.
The engagement replaced a debate between two internal positions with a specific, evidence-backed recommendation and a rollout plan the clinical and commercial directors could both commit to.
Impact
- Market benchmarking confirmed in-house builds at comparable groups consistently overran timeline and cost estimates.
- White-label partnerships delivered comparable or better client adoption and retention at a fraction of the in-house capital cost.
- One platform was identified as offering direct integration with the group’s existing practice management software.
- The same platform offered deeper white-label branding, presenting no third-party attribution in the client-facing experience.
- Post-operative monitoring and triage calls were identified as the highest-volume, lowest-acuity use case category for immediate telehealth formalisation.
- A white-label partnership agreement was signed within three months of the strategy recommendation.
- The service launched across all thirty-two practices within six months.
- Post-operative consultation completion rates improved measurably within the first two quarters of operation.
Client Outcome
Partnership Signed
A white-label platform agreement was signed within three months, with launch across all thirty-two practices within six months.
Consultation Completion
Post-operative consultation completion rates improved measurably within the first two quarters of telehealth operation.
Build Cost Avoided
In-house development cost was avoided following benchmarking confirmation that comparable builds had consistently overrun.
Clinical Integration
Direct integration with the group's practice management software ensured telehealth consultation notes linked automatically to patient records.
Brand Continuity
Full white-label branding ensured the service presented under the group's own brand with no visible third-party attribution.
Informal Calls Formalised
Post-operative and triage calls that had been unpaid clinical time were converted to structured, billed telehealth consultations.
Phased Rollout
A five-practice pilot at the highest-volume triage locations preceded full network rollout, managing clinical adoption risk.
Director Alignment
The clinical and commercial directors aligned around a shared, evidence-based recommendation after a debate that internal advocacy alone had not resolved.
Market Positioning
The veterinary group was repositioned as a digitally capable multi-site practice offering structured remote care rather than informal phone triage.
Case Studies
Learn how our success stories power data-driven growth across industries
Fewer Stampings, Different Stampings: How a Metal Forming Toolmaker Used Market Research and Strategy Advisory to Navigate the EV Transition’s Impact on Its Stamping Die Business
Executive Snapshot Client Automotive Stamping Die Manufacturer, Bavaria, Germany Situation/Challenge...
Read MoreStopping the Stops: How an Automotive Parts Manufacturer Used Consulting and Analytics to Identify the Real Causes of Unplanned Downtime Across Its Horizontal Machining Centre Fleet
Executive Snapshot Client Tier-Two Automotive Parts Manufacturer, Czech Republic Situation/Challenge...
Read MoreFull Shop, Empty Machine: How a Steel Fabrication Business Used Market Research and IDIs to Understand Why Its Plasma Cutting Capacity Was Underused Despite Strong Demand in the Market
Executive Snapshot Client Structural Steel Fabricator, Ohio, United States Situation/Challenge...
Read More