Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Qualified or Quick: How an Aerospace MRO Supplier Used Market Research and Consulting to Decide Which Parts Were Worth Certifying for Additive Manufacturing

Qualified or Quick: How an Aerospace MRO Supplier Used Market Research and Consulting to Decide Which Parts Were Worth Certifying for Additive Manufacturing

Executive Snapshot

Client

Aerospace MRO Component Supplier, United States

Situation/Challenge

The client had invested in metal additive manufacturing capacity on the expectation that it would reduce lead times on long-lead MRO components and lower inventory carrying costs. Eighteen months later, its qualification team was overwhelmed, the certification pipeline covered too many part numbers to move through regulatory approval at a useful pace, and the financial case for additive was looking weaker than the original business plan had projected.

Objective

Commission a global aerospace additive manufacturing market research report benchmarking which part characteristics consistently delivered the strongest economic case for additive, then engage consulting to rationalise the client's own qualification pipeline to the parts most likely to justify the certification investment.

Constancy Researchers Solution

Market Research Reports combined with Consulting Services, a Global Aerospace 3D Printing Market Report benchmarking part-level economic drivers of additive adoption, followed by a consulting engagement rationalising the client's qualification pipeline against commercial and technical viability criteria.

Impact

Market research identified that additive's strongest MRO economics were consistently concentrated in low-volume, geometrically complex parts with long conventional lead times, and that the client's qualification pipeline was heavily weighted toward simpler, higher-volume parts where conventional supply remained competitive. Consulting work cut the qualification pipeline from over sixty part numbers to fourteen priority candidates.

Client Outcome

The rationalised pipeline cleared its first four regulatory approvals within two quarters, and those four parts delivered average lead time reductions and inventory savings consistent with the original business plan projections.

The Situation / Challenge

Additive manufacturing’s appeal in aerospace MRO rests on a specific economic logic: for parts that take months to source conventionally, are ordered in small quantities, and require complex geometry that drives conventional machining cost, printing on demand can be dramatically more economical than maintaining inventory or waiting for a conventional supplier. That logic holds strongly for some parts and barely at all for others, and the companies that get the most out of additive investment are typically those that have been precise about which category each part belongs to.

The client had built its additive business case on an aggregate calculation rather than a part-by-part analysis, and the aggregate had looked attractive enough to justify the capital investment. When the qualification team began working through the actual part list, however, the mix turned out to be less favourable than assumed.

Without a structured filter to separate the parts worth certifying from those the conventional supply chain could serve adequately, the qualification team was carrying costs and delays with no clear path to the returns that had originally justified the additive investment.

Key Challenges

  • No independent market benchmarking establishing which part characteristics consistently drove the strongest economic case for additive in aerospace MRO.
  • No structured part-level filter to separate the qualification pipeline into candidates where additive was genuinely superior and those where conventional supply remained competitive.
  • A qualification pipeline covering too many part numbers for the certification team to process at a commercially useful pace.
  • Aggregate business case economics that had obscured the actual part-by-part distribution of additive viability in the client’s specific portfolio.
  • Certification team capacity consumed by lower-value parts rather than concentrated on the candidates with the strongest economic return.
  • Leadership pressure to demonstrate financial return from the additive investment before the next budget cycle review.

Additive manufacturing in aerospace MRO generates its strongest returns on a specific subset of parts. Qualifying every part that could theoretically be printed without filtering for the ones where the economics are genuinely compelling tends to produce a certification backlog that delays the return on every part, including the ones that would have justified the investment on their own.

Constancy Researchers Solution

Constancy Researchers combined market benchmarking of part-level additive economics with a consulting assessment of the client’s own qualification pipeline, applying the benchmarked criteria directly to the client’s specific part population to produce a rationalised, commercially prioritised certification list.

Global Aerospace 3D Printing Market Sizing & Part Economics Benchmarking
  • Delivered a market research report sizing the global aerospace additive manufacturing market and benchmarking the part characteristics that consistently produced the strongest economic returns.
  • Confirmed that the strongest additive MRO economics concentrated in parts with three characteristics: low conventional order volumes, complex geometry that drove conventional machining cost, and lead times exceeding twelve weeks through standard supply channels.
Client Pipeline Part-by-Part Economic Assessment
  • Applied the benchmarked economic criteria to the client’s full qualification pipeline of over sixty part numbers, scoring each against conventional lead time, order volume, geometric complexity.
  • Found that fewer than a quarter of the parts in the pipeline scored strongly against all three economic criteria, with the majority being simpler.
Qualification Priority Ranking & Pipeline Rationalisation
  • Ranked all sixty-plus part numbers against the economic scoring framework and applied a certification investment threshold to identify the parts where the expected life-of-programme economic return justified the qualification cost and regulatory timeline.
  • Delivered a rationalised pipeline of fourteen priority part numbers, removing forty-six candidates where the additive economics were too weak to justify the certification investment at the client’s actual production volumes.
Regulatory Pathway & Timeline Assessment
  • Assessed the specific regulatory approval pathways applicable to each of the fourteen priority parts, mapping the certification evidence requirements, expected FAA or EASA review timeline.
  • Identified two parts in the priority fourteen where existing material and process qualification data from the client’s current additive programme could be leveraged to shorten the certification timeline relative to a fresh submission.
Commercial Prioritisation & Team Capacity Reallocation
  • Delivered a sequenced certification workplan concentrating the qualification team’s capacity on the fourteen priority parts, with the two shortest-path regulatory approvals scheduled first to generate early commercial return and demonstrate programme viability to leadership.

The engagement replaced a qualification process that was generating cost without pace with one focused precisely on the parts where additive investment would actually deliver the return the original business case had described.

Impact

  • Market benchmarking confirmed the three part characteristics that consistently drove the strongest additive MRO economics.
  • The pipeline assessment found fewer than a quarter of the existing sixty-plus part numbers scored strongly against all three economic criteria.
  • Forty-six part numbers were removed from the priority qualification pipeline.
  • A rationalised pipeline of fourteen priority parts was delivered, concentrated on candidates with the strongest expected life-of-programme return.
  • Two parts with existing qualification data leverage points were identified, shortening their expected certification timeline.
  • The qualification team’s capacity was reoriented toward the fourteen priority parts rather than spread across the full original pipeline.
  • The first four regulatory approvals from the rationalised pipeline cleared within two quarters.
  • Those four approved parts delivered lead time reductions and inventory savings consistent with the original business plan projections.

Client Outcome

Pipeline Rationalisation

The qualification pipeline was reduced from over sixty part numbers to fourteen priority candidates.

Regulatory Progress

Four regulatory approvals cleared within two quarters of the rationalised pipeline being implemented.

Financial Return

The first four approved parts delivered lead time reductions and inventory savings consistent with the original business plan projections.

Team Capacity

Qualification team capacity was reoriented from a broad, low-return pipeline to a focused programme of high-priority candidates.

Economic Clarity

The part-level scoring framework gave leadership a clear, defensible explanation of which parts would justify additive certification investment.

Timeline Acceleration

Regulatory pathway mapping identified two parts where existing qualification data could shorten the certification timeline.

Business Case Validation

The four approved parts demonstrated that the additive business case held strongly for the right part characteristics.

Portfolio Discipline

A repeatable economic scoring framework was retained for evaluating future part additions to the additive qualification pipeline.

Market Positioning

The supplier was repositioned as an additive MRO operator that qualifies parts on the basis of economic viability evidence.

Looking to unlock new growth opportunities with data-driven insights?

Connect Now

Case Studies

Learn how our success stories power data-driven growth across industries

Speak with an Analyst

    Download TOC

      Request a Sample Report